Two different lists, and vendors usually blur them. The first is where we're genuinely behind. The second is engineering we decided against on purpose and do not intend to add. You deserve to know which is which before you buy.
The established platforms in this space have a decade of field deployments, large support organizations, and government certifications we're still on the roadmap toward. FORGE is validated on a faithful WAN-emulation rig, with a live-radio field trial as our next milestone. What we offer today is a fundamentally better architecture for resilience and operator truth, a platform you can run on your own hardware, and an engineer who answers the phone. If you need a vendor with a thousand existing installs, that's a real reason to look elsewhere. If you want the platform that was built by breaking it and shows you the truth, book the demo and break it yourself.
These are not gaps in a roadmap. They are decisions, and a competitor's datasheet will list several of them as features we lack.
Break-then-make has a price and here it is, taken from drills on our lab fleet rather than from a marketing target. Vendors who advertise sub-second failover are describing a WAN path dropping, which ours survives without loss too. These numbers are for losing an entire hub, and this table is the only place on this page they are stated.
Measured on the lab fleet, FORGE OS 0.9.283, across BGP and OSPF sites. Unplanned-loss figures ranged 33–55 s over repeated runs; we publish the slow end. A planned reboot causes no failover because the hold for a clean hub close outlasts the reboot — sites stay put rather than moving twice.
Thirty minutes, a live system, and you pick what fails. Watch the honest status and the zero-loss WAN failover for yourself.